BFS Vs DFS
📊 Comparison of BFS and DFS
| Feature | BFS (Breadth First Search) | DFS (Depth First Search) |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Explores neighbors first (level by level). | Explores as far as possible along one branch before backtracking. |
| Data Structure Used | Queue (FIFO). | Stack (explicit stack or recursion). |
| Traversal Order | Visits nodes in increasing "distance" from the source. | Visits nodes by diving deep into a path before exploring siblings. |
| Typical Output Example | Source → Neighbors → Next level … | Source → First child → Child’s child … backtrack … |
| Time Complexity | O(V + E) (same as DFS). | O(V + E) (same as BFS). |
| Space Complexity | O(V) (queue stores many nodes at a time, worst case). | O(V) (stack/recursion depth). |
| Shortest Path | Yes ✅ (in unweighted graphs, BFS finds shortest path). | No ❌ (DFS does not guarantee shortest path). |
| Completeness | Always finds a solution if one exists. | May not find shortest solution; may get trapped without visited checks. |
| Application Areas | - Shortest path in unweighted graphs - Level order traversal in trees - Networking (broadcasting, routing) | - Topological sorting - Detecting cycles - Solving puzzles/mazes - Path existence checking |
| Best For | Problems requiring shortest path or level-order info. | Problems requiring exhaustive search or backtracking. |
👉 Quick intuition for students:
-
BFS = “spreading out layer by layer” (like ripples in water).
-
DFS = “diving deep into a path” before coming back up.
Comments
Post a Comment